Sunday, September 30, 2007


This is a list of paradoxes, grouped thematically. Note that many of the listed paradoxes have a clear resolution. — see Quine's Classification of Paradoxes.

Logical (except mathematical)
These paradoxes have in common a contradiction arising from self-reference.

Berry paradox: The phrase "the first number not nameable in under ten words" appears to name it in nine words.
Curry's paradox: "If this sentence is true, the world will end in a week."
Epimenides paradox: A Cretan says "All Cretans are liars".
Exception paradox: "If there is an exception to every rule, then every rule must have at least one exception, excepting this one" ...is there an exception to the rule that states that there is an exception to every rule?
Grelling-Nelson paradox: Is the word "heterological", meaning "not applicable to itself," a heterological word? (Another close relative of Russell's paradox.)
Hegel's paradox: "Man learns from history that man learns nothing from history."
Intentionally blank page: Many documents contain pages on which the text "This page is intentionally blank" is printed, thereby making the page not blank.
Liar paradox: "This sentence is false." This is the canonical self-referential paradox. Also "Is the answer to this question no?"
The Y combinator in the lambda calculus and combinatory logic has been called the paradoxical combinator since it is related to the self-referential antinomies.
Petronius' paradox: "Moderation in all things, including moderation."
Quine's paradox: "yields a falsehood when appended to its own quotation" yields a falsehood when appended to its own quotation.
Paradox of the Court: A law student agrees to pay his teacher after winning his first case. The teacher then sues the student (who has not yet won a case) for payment.
Russell's paradox: Does the set of all those sets that do not contain themselves contain itself? Russell popularized it with the Barber paradox: The adult male barber who shaves all men who do not shave themselves, and no-one else.
Richard's paradox: We appear to be able to use simple English to define a decimal expansion in a way which is self-contradictory. Self-referential

Ship of Theseus (a.k.a. George Washington's or Grandfather's old axe): It seems like you can replace any component of a ship, and it will still be the same ship. So you can replace them all, or one at a time, and it will still be the same ship. But then you can take all the original pieces, and assemble them into a ship. That, too, is the same ship you started with.
Sorites paradox: One grain of sand is not a heap. If you don't have a heap, then adding only one grain of sand won't give you a heap. Then no number of grains of sand will make a heap. Similarly, one hair can't make the difference between being bald and not being bald. But then if you remove one hair at a time, you will never become bald. Vagueness
See also: Category:Mathematics paradoxes

Apportionment paradox: Some systems of apportioning representation can have unintuitive results due to rounding

  • Alabama paradox: Increasing the total number of seats might shrink one block's seats.
    New states paradox: Adding a new state or voting block might increase the number of votes of another.
    Population paradox: A fast growing state can lose votes to a slow growing state.
    Arithmetic paradoxes: Proofs of obvious contradictions; for example, proving that 2=1 by writing a huge expression and dividing by another expression that is zero.
    Arrow's paradox/Voting paradox You can't have all the attributes of an ideal voting system at once.
    Benford's law: In lists of numbers from many real-life sources of data, the leading digit 1 occurs much more often than the others.
    Condorcet's paradox: A group of separately rational individuals may have preferences which are irrational in the aggregate.
    Elevator paradox: Elevators can seem to be mostly going in one direction, as if they were being manufactured in the middle of the building and being disassembled on the roof and basement.
    Inspection paradox: Why you will wait longer for that bus than you should.
    Interesting number paradox: The first number that can be considered "dull" rather than "interesting" becomes interesting because of that fact.
    Intransitive dice: You can have three dice, called A, B, and C, such that A is likely to win in a roll against B, B is likely to win in a roll against C, and C is likely to win in a roll against A.
    Lindley's paradox: tiny errors in the null hypothesis are magnified when large data sets are analyzed, leading to false but highly statistically significant results
    Low birth weight paradox: Low birth weight and mothers who smoke contribute to a higher mortality rate. Babies of smokers have lower average birth weight, but low birth weight babies born to smokers have a lower mortality rate than other low birth weight babies. (A special case of Simpson's paradox.)
    Missing dollar paradox: Faulty logic makes it appear as if a dollar from a restaurant bill has gone missing. Not in the same class as the others.
    Statistical paradox: It is quite possible to draw wrong conclusions from correlation. For example, towns with a larger number of churches generally have a higher crime rate — because both result from higher population. A professional organization once found that economists with a Ph.D. actually had a lower average salary than those with a BS — but this was found to be due to the fact that those with a Ph.D. worked in academia, where salaries are generally lower. This is also called a spurious relationship.
    Will Rogers phenomenon: the mathematical concept of an average, whether defined as the mean or median, leads to apparently paradoxical results — for example, it is possible that moving an entry from an encyclopedia to a dictionary would increase the average entry length on both books.
    Smallest number paradox describes how a rolling object should be able to attain a velocity of the smallest positive number. List of paradoxes Mathematical and statistical
    See also: Category:Probability theory paradoxes

    Berkson's paradox: a complicating factor arising in statistical tests of proportions
    Bertrand's paradox (probability): Different common-sense definitions of randomness give quite different results.
    Birthday paradox: What is the chance that two people in a room have the same birthday?
    Borel's paradox: Conditional probability density functions are not invariant under coordinate transformations.
    Boy or Girl: A two-child family has at least one boy. What is the probability that it has a girl?
    Monty Hall problem: An unintuitive consequence of conditional probability. Essentially the same as the Three Prisoners Problem.
    Necktie Paradox : A wager between two people seems to favour them both. Very similar in essence to the Two-envelope paradox.
    Simpson's paradox: An association in sub-populations may be reversed in the population. It appears that two sets of data separately support a certain hypothesis, but, when considered together, they support the opposite hypothesis.
    Sleeping Beauty problem: A probability problem that can be correctly answered as one half or one third depending on how the question is approached.
    Three cards problem: When pulling a random card, how do you determine the color of the underside?
    Two-envelope paradox: You are given two indistinguishable envelopes and you are told one contains twice as much money as the other. You may open one envelope, examine its contents, and then, without opening the other, choose which envelope to take. Infinity

    Banach–Tarski paradox: Cut a ball into 5 pieces, re-assemble the pieces to get two balls, both of equal size to the first.
    Gabriel's Horn or Torricelli's trumpet: A simple object with finite volume but infinite surface area. Also, the Mandelbrot set and various other fractals are covered by a finite shape, but have an infinite perimeter (in fact, there are no two distinct points on the boundary of the Mandelbrot set that can be reached from one another by moving a finite distance along that boundary, which also implies that in a sense you go no further if you walk "the wrong way" around the set to reach a nearby point).
    Hausdorff paradox: There exists a countable subset C of the sphere S such that SC is equidecomposable with two copies of itself.
    Coastline paradox: the perimeter of a landmass is in general ill-defined
    Smale's paradox: A sphere can, topologically, be turned inside out.
    Missing square puzzle: Two similar figures appear to have different areas while built from the same pieces.
    No Shortcuts paradox: The length of the hypotenuse in a right triangle is not shorter then the sum of the two axis-parallel legs, i.e., the direct connection between two points (which should amount to the euclidean distance) is not shorter than a path with segments that are orthogonal to each other (which amounts to the Manhattan distance). (See this reference) List of paradoxes Geometry and topology

    Main article: Decision theory Decision theoretic

    SAR paradox: Exceptions to the principle that a small change in a molecule causes a small change in its chemical behavior are frequently profound.
    The Levinthal paradox : The length of time in which a protein chain finds its folded state is many orders of magnitude shorter than it would be if it freely searched all possible configurations. Chemical

    Main article: physical paradox Philosophical
    See also: Category:Economics paradoxes

    Abilene paradox: A group of people often has to decide against each member's own personal interests or views.
    Allais paradox: A change in a possible outcome which is shared by different alternatives affects people's choices among those alternatives, in contradiction with expected utility theory.
    Bertrand paradox: Two players reaching a state of Nash equilibrium both find themselves with no profits.
    Diamond-water paradox (or paradox of value) Neither water nor diamonds are rare, but water is cheaper than diamonds, though humans need water to survive, not diamonds.
    Edgeworth paradox: With capacity constraints, there may not be an equilibrium.
    Ellsberg paradox: People exhibit ambiguity aversion (as distinct from risk aversion), in contradiction with expected utility theory.
    Gibson's paradox: Why were interest rates and prices correlated?
    Giffen paradox: Increasing the price of bread makes poor people eat more of it.
    Jevons paradox: Increases in efficiency lead to even larger increases in demand.
    Leontief paradox: Some countries export labor-intensive commodities and import capital-intensive commodities, in contradiction with Heckscher-Ohlin theory.
    Paradox of thrift: If everyone saves more money during times of recession, then aggregate demand will fall and will in turn lower total savings in the population.
    Parrondo's paradox: It is possible to play two losing games alternately to eventually win.
    Productivity paradox, Solow computer paradox Worker productivity may go down, despite technological improvements...
    St. Petersburg paradox: People will only offer a modest fee for a reward of infinite value.

Saturday, September 29, 2007

Evangeline Baseball League
The Evangeline Baseball League began in 1934 as a six-team Class-D minor league in and around Louisiana, United States. The following season, the league was expanded to eight teams and ceased his operation in 1942, with six teams, during World War II conflict. It resumed his activities in 1946, getting promoted to Class-C in 1949, and lasted through 1957. The Alexandria Aces were the only team that played in all 21 regular seasons.

List of teams (in alphabetical order)

Abbeville A's (1935-39)
Abbeville Athletics (1946-50, 1952)
Alexandria Aces (1934-42, 1946-57)
Baton Rouge Rebels (1956-57)
Baton Rouge Red Sticks (1946-55)
Crowley Millers (1951-57)
Hammond Berries (1946-51)
Houma Buccaneers/Natchez Pilgrims (1940)
Houma Indians (1946-52)
Jeanerette Blues (1935-39)
Lafayette Bulls (1948-53)
Lafayette Oilers (1954-57)
Lafayette White Sox (1934-42)
Lake Charles Skippers (1935-42)
Lake Charles Explorers/Jeanerette Blues (1934)
Lake Charles Giants (1956-57)
Lake Charles Lakers (1954-55)
Monroe Sports (1956)
Natchez Giants (1942, 1946-47)
Natchez Pilgrims (1941)
New Iberia Cardinals (1934-42, 1946-47, 1949, 1953)
New Iberia Indians (1957)
New Iberia Pelicans (1948, 1951-52, 1954-55)
New Iberia Rebels (1950)
Opelousas Indians (1934-41)
Port Arthur Sea Hawks (1954)
Port Arthur Tarpons (1940-42)
Rayne Red Sox (1934)
Rayne Rice Birds (1935-41)
Texas City Pilots (1954)
Thibodaux Giants (1946-53)
Thibodaux Pilots (1954)
Thibodaux Senators (1956-57)

Friday, September 28, 2007

Pope Gregory IV
Gregory IV, pope (September 20, 827-January 11, 844), was chosen to succeed Valentine in December 827, on which occasion he recognized the supremacy of the Frankish emperor Louis the Pious in the most unequivocal manner.
Papal dependence on the Holy Roman Emperor loosened through the quarrels of Louis I the Pious and his sons, the future Lothair I, Pepin and Louis the German. On the sons' rebellion against their father, Gregory supported Lothair, hoping his intervention would promote peace, but in practice this action annoyed the Frankish bishops. Gregory's response was to insist upon the primacy of St Peter's successor, the papacy being superior to the Emperor.
The two armies, of Louis and his sons, met at Rotfeld, near Colmar, in the summer of 833. The sons persuaded Gregory to go to Louis' camp to negotiate, but he then found he had been duped by Lothair. Louis was deserted by his supporters and was forced to surrender unconditionally, and was deposed and humiliated. This sequence of events is known as the Campus Mendacii or "field of lies." Louis was subsequently restored, and after his death Gregory made unsuccessful attempts to mediate in the conflict that ensued between the brothers.
Gregory contributed to the architectural development of Rome (he rebuilt the Basilica di San Marco) and promoted the celebration of the feast of All Saints.

Thursday, September 27, 2007

Argentina
Argentina, officially the Argentine Republic (Spanish: República Argentina, IPA: [reˈpuβlika aɾxenˈtina], Nación Argentina (Argentine Nation) for many legal purposes), is a South American country, second in size in the continent to Brazil and eighth in the world. Argentina occupies a continental surface area of 2,766,890 km² (1,078,000 sq mi) between the Andes mountain range in the west and the southern Atlantic Ocean in the east and south.
It is bordered by Paraguay and Bolivia in the north, Brazil and Uruguay in the northeast, and Chile in the west and south. The country claims the British controlled territories of the Falkland Islands (Spanish: Islas Malvinas) and South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands. Under the name of Argentine Antarctica, it claims 969,464 km² (374,312 sq mi) of Antarctica, overlapping other claims made by Chile and the United Kingdom.

"Argentina" derives from the Latin argentum (silver). When the first Spanish conquistadors discovered the Río de la Plata, they named the estuary Mar Dulce ('Sweet Sea', as in a fresh water sea). Indigenous people gave gifts of silver to the survivors of the shipwrecked expedition, who were led by Juan Díaz de Solís. The legend of Sierra del Plata – a mountain rich in silver – reached Spain around 1524, and the name was first seen in print on a Venice map from 1536. The source of the silver was the area where the city of Potosí was to be founded in 1546. An expedition that followed the trail of the silver up the Paraná and Pilcomayo rivers finally reached the source only to find it already claimed by explorers who reached it from Lima, the capital of the Viceroyalty of Peru.
The name Argentina was first used extensively in the 1612 book Historia del descubrimiento, población, y conquista del Río de la Plata (History of the discovery, population, and conquest of the Río de la Plata) by Ruy Díaz de Guzmán, naming the territory Tierra Argentina (Land of Silver).
(Spanish) Supreme Court of Justice of Argentina
(Spanish) Presidency of Argentina
(Spanish) Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores, Comercio Internacional y Culto (official website of the Argentine Ministry of Foreign Relations, International Trade and Worship)
The Special Relationship between Argentina and Brazil
(Spanish) Historia de las Relaciones Exteriores Argentinas. History of Argentine foreign relations.
(Spanish) (English) Argentina.gov.ar - Official national portal
(Spanish) Gobierno Electrónico - Government website
(Spanish) Presidencia de la Nación - Presidential website
(Spanish) Honorable Senado de la Nación - Website of the Senate
(Spanish) Honorable Cámara de Diputados de la Nación - Website of the CHamber of Deputies
(Spanish) Secretaría de Turismo de la Nación - National Tourism Secretariat website
(English) WikiTravel's Argentina Page
(English) Library of Congress
(English) Open Directory Project
(English) Encyclopaedia Britannica - Argentina's Country Page
(English) CIA World Factbook entry on Argentina
(English) - Travel Advice & Recommendations From Local Experts
For links to online newspapers, see List of newspapers in Argentina.
(English) Argentina Paper Money

Wednesday, September 26, 2007


Stephen "Steve" Charles Balboni (born January 16, 1957) is a retired Major League Baseball player with the New York Yankees, Seattle Mariners, Kansas City Royals, and Texas Rangers. He was a player with good home run power and a tendency to strike out. He was nicknamed "Bye Bye" because of his home run power. He also occasionally went by the nickname "Bones" -- a play on words due to his substantial girth.

New York Yankees (1981-1983, 1989-1990)
Kansas City Royals (1984-1988)
Seattle Mariners (1988)
Texas Rangers (1993)
181 Career Home Runs
Finished 3rd in the A.L. in Home Runs (36) in 1985 Steve Balboni College career
Balboni played in the minors off and on from 1978 to 1993. In a total of 9 seasons in the minors, he hit 239 home runs and drove in 772 runs. He also struck out 930 times. His career minor league batting average was .261. He won the Most Valuable Player award in 1979 with the Fort Lauderdale Yankees of the Florida State League and in 1980 for the Nashville Sounds of the Southern League.
Balboni led the league in home runs six different seasons, 1979, 1980, 1981, 1982, 1992 and 1993. He led the league in Runs Batted In in 4 seasons, 1979, 1980, 1981 and 1992. He led the league in strikeouts in 2 seasons, 1979 and 1981. He homered every 14.6 at bats and struck out every 3.8 at bats in the Minors.

Canadian-American League See also

Career statistics and player information from Baseball-Reference
The Curse of the Balboni

Tuesday, September 25, 2007


The SCO-Linux controversies are a series of legal and public disputes between the software company SCO Group (SCO) and various Linux vendors and users. The SCO Group alleges that its license agreements with IBM mean that source code that IBM wrote and donated to be incorporated into Linux was added in violation of SCO's contractual rights. Members of the Linux community disagree with SCO's claims; IBM and Red Hat have counter-sued.

SCO-Linux controversies
Timeline of SCO-Linux controversies
SCO and SGI
SCOsource
SCO v. IBM
SCO v. DaimlerChrysler
SCO v. AutoZone
SCO v. Novell
Red Hat v. SCO
SCO Group
IBM
Novell
Groklaw
Ralph Yarro III
Pamela Jones
Darl McBride
Marc J. Rochkind
United Linux
USL v. BSDi
Caldera OpenLinux Background
SCO's claims are derived from several contracts that may have transferred UNIX System V Release 4 intellectual property assets. The UNIX IP rights originated with Unix System Laboratories (USL), a division of AT&T. In 1993, USL sold all UNIX rights and assets to Novell, including copyrights, trademarks, and active licensing contracts. Some of these rights and assets, plus additional assets derived from Novell's development work, were then sold to the Santa Cruz Operation in 1995. The Santa Cruz Operation had developed and was selling a PC-based UNIX until 2000, when it then resold its UNIX assets to Caldera, which later changed its name to SCO Group.
Through this chain of sales, SCO claims to be the "owner of UNIX". The validity of these claims is hotly contested by others. SCO claims copyright to all UNIX code developed by USL, referred to as SVRx, and licensing contracts originating with AT&T, saying that these are inherited through the same chain of sales. The primary document SCO presents as evidence of these claims is the "Asset Purchase Agreement", defining the sale between Novell and the Santa Cruz Operation. SCO says that this includes all copyrights to the UNIX code base and contractual rights to the licensing base. The other parties disagree.

UNIX SVRx
The status of copyrights from USL is murky, since UNIX code is a compilation of elements with different copyright histories. Some code was released without copyright notice before changes in the Copyright Act of 1976 made copyright automatic. This code may be in the public domain and not subject to copyright claims. Other code is affected by the USL v. BSDi case, and is covered by the BSD License.
Recently, Groklaw was able to uncover an old settlement made between Unix System Laboratories (USL) and The University of California..

UNIX copyrights ownership
The Novell to Santa Cruz Operation Asset Purchase Agreement also involved the administration of some 6000 standing licensing agreements between various UNIX users and the previous owners. These licensees include universities, software corporations and computer hardware companies. SCO's claimed ownership of the licenses has become an issue in three aspects of the SCO-Linux controversies. The first was the cancellation of IBM's license, the second was SCO's complaint against DaimlerChrysler (see SCO v. DaimlerChrysler), and the third is the derivative works claim of the SCO v. IBM case.
In May 2003, SCO canceled IBM's SVRx license to its version of UNIX, AIX. This was based on SCO's claim of unrestricted ownership of the System V licensing contracts inherited from USL. IBM ignored the license cancellation, claiming that an amendment to the original license made it "irrevocable." In addition, as part of the Purchase Agreement, Novell retained certain rights of control over the administration of the licenses which were sold, including rights to act on SCO's behalf in some cases. Novell exercised one of these rights by revoking SCO's cancellation of the IBM license. SCO disputed the validity of both of these actions, and amended its SCO v. IBM complaint to include copyright infringement, based on IBM's continued sale and use of AIX without a valid SVRx license.
In December 2003, SCO demanded that all UNIX licensees certify some items, some related to the use of Linux, that were not provided for in the license agreement language. Since DaimlerChrysler failed to respond, SCO filed the SCO v. DaimlerChrysler suit in March 2004. All claims related to the certification demands were summarily dismissed by the court.
The third issue based on the UNIX licensees agreement is related to SCO's claims of control of derivative works. This is a major and complex question and is discussed in a separate section below.

License administration standing
Many UNIX licensees have added features to the core UNIX SVRx system and those new features contain computer code not in the original SVRx code base. In most cases, software copyright is owned by the person or company that develops the code. SCO, however, claims that the original licensing agreements define this new code as a derivative work. They also claim that they have the right to control and restrict the use and distribution of that new code.
These claims are the basis of SCO v. IBM. SCO's initial complaint, [1], said that IBM violated the original licensing agreement by not maintaining confidentiality with the new code, developed and copyrighted by IBM, and releasing it to the Linux project.
IBM claims that the license agreement (noted in the $Echo newsletter of April 1985, [2]) and subsequent licenses defines derivative works as the developer's property. This leaves IBM free to do as it wishes with its new code. In August 2004, IBM filed a motion for partial summary judgment. The motion stated that IBM has the right to do as it wishes with software not part of the original SVRx code. In February 2005, the motion was dismissed as premature, because discovery was not yet complete. IBM is able to refile the motion after discovery is completed.

SCO-Linux controversies Control of derivative works
SCO claims that Linux infringes SCO's copyright, trade secrets, and contractual rights. This claim is fundamental to the SCOsource program, where SCO has demanded that Linux users obtain licenses from SCOsource to be properly licensed to use the code in question. Exactly which parts of Linux are involved remains unclear as many of their claims are still under seal in the SCO v. IBM lawsuit.
SCO originally claimed in SCO v. IBM that IBM had violated trade secrets. But these alleged violations by IBM would not have involved Linux distributors or end users. SCO's trade secret claims were dropped by SCO in their amended complaint.[3]
SCO also claimed line for line literal copying of code from UNIX code files to Linux kernel files and obfuscated copying of code, but originally refused to publicly identify which code was in violation. SCO submitted to the court evidence of their claims under seal but much of it was excluded from the case after it was challenged by IBM as not meeting the specificity requirements to be included.
These examples have fallen into two groups. The first are segments of files or whole files alleged to originate in UNIX SVRx code such as the errno.h header file. The second group are files and materials contributed by IBM that originated with IBM development work associated with AIX and Dynix, IBM's two UNIX products.
Each of these has a different set of issues. In order for copyright to be violated, several conditions must be met. First, the claimant must be able to show that they own the copyrights for the material in question. Second, all or a significant part of the source must be present in the infringing material. There must be enough similarity to show direct copying of material.

SCO allegations of copyright and trade secret violations
The issue of ownership of the SVRx code base was discussed above. Besides the unresolved issue of what was actually transferred from Novell to Santa Cruz Operation, there are also the portions of the SVRx code base that are covered by BSD copyrights or that are in the public domain.
SCO's first public disclosure of what they claim is infringing code was at SCOForum in August 2003. The first, known as the Berkeley Packet Filter, was distributed under the BSD License and is freely usable by anyone. The second example was related to memory allocation functions, also released under the BSD License. It is no longer in the Linux code base. In AutoZone, SCO's complaint claimed damages for AutoZone's use of Linux. However, when objecting to AutoZone's request for a stay pending the IBM case, SCO apparently contradicted their written complaint, claiming that the case was entirely about AutoZone copying certain libraries (outside the Linux kernel) from a UNIX system to a Linux-based system to facilitate moving an internal application to the Linux platform faster; SCO's original complaint does not appear to mention these libraries. AutoZone denies having done this with UNIX libraries. If SCO's oral description of their case is the correct one, then their AutoZone claim has nothing to do with the Linux kernel or the actions of any distributors.
The copyright issue is addressed directly in two of the cases. The first is by IBM in their counterclaim in SCO v. IBM. The issue is central to a pending motion by IBM, stating that IBM violated no copyrights in its Linux related activities. It is also addressed by Red Hat in the Red Hat v. SCO case. Red Hat claims that SCO's statements about infringement in Linux are unproven and untrue, damaging to them and violates the Lanham Act. Red Hat asks for an injunction to stop claims of violations without proof. They also ask for a judgment that they violated no SCO copyrights. A hearing on the IBM motion was held in September 15, 2004. Judge Kimball took the motion under advisement. The Red Hat case is on hold.

SVRx code allegedly in Linux
EWeek has reported allegations that SCO may have copied parts of the Linux kernel into SCO UNIX as part of its Linux Kernel Personality feature. If true, this would mean that SCO is guilty of a breach of the Linux kernel copyrights. SCO has denied this allegation.

Allegations of reverse copying
SCO has claimed a number of instances of IBM Linux code as breaches of contract. These examples include code related to Symmetric multiprocessing (SMP), Journaled File System (JFS), Read-copy-update (RCU) and Non-Uniform Memory Access (NUMA). This code is unquestionably in the Linux kernel, and was added by IBM through the normal kernel submission process. This code was developed and copyrighted by IBM. IBM added features to AIX and Dynix.
SCO claims that they have "control rights" to this due to their licensing agreements with IBM. SCO disavows claiming that they own the code IBM wrote, rather comparing their "control rights" to an easement, rights which allow them to prohibit IBM from publicizing the code they wrote, even though IBM owns the copyrights. They base this claim on language in the original license agreement that requires non-disclosure of the code and claim that all code developed by UNIX licensees that is used with the code under license be held in confidence. This claim is discussed above at Control of derivative works.

IBM code in Linux
Before changing their name to the SCO Group, the company was known as Caldera. Caldera was one of the major distributors of Linux from 1994 to 2003. Some, like Eben Moglen, have suggested that because Caldera distributed the infringing code under the GNU General Public License, or GPL, that this act would license any proprietary code in Linux[5].
SCO has stated that they did not know their own code was in Linux, so releasing it under the GPL does not count. This claim however seems very questionable given that as late as July and August of 2006, long after that claim has been made, they were still distributing allegedly disputed source code under the GPL with apparent full knowledge of the fact [6] [7]
SCO has also claimed in early stages of the litigation, that the GPL is invalid and non-binding and legally unenforcable. [8] In response, supporters of the GPL, such as Eben Moglen, claimed that SCO's right to distribute Linux relied upon the GPL being a valid copyright license[9]. Later court filings by the SCO group in SCO v. IBM use SCO's alleged compliance with the license as a defense to IBM's counterclaims[10].
The GPL has become an issue in SCO v. IBM. Under U.S. copyright law, distribution of creative works whose copyright is owned by another party is illegal without permission from the copyright owner, usually in the form of a license; the GPL is such a license, and thus allows distribution, but only under limited conditions. Since IBM released the relevant code under the terms of the GPL, it claims that the only permission that SCO has to copy and distribute IBM's code in Linux is under the terms and conditions of the GPL, one of which requires the distributor to "accept" the GPL. IBM says that SCO violated the GPL by denouncing the GPL's validity, and by claiming that the GPL violates the U.S. Constitution, together with copyright, antitrust and export control laws. IBM also claims that SCO's SCOsource program is incompatible with the requirement that redistributions of GPLed works must be free of copyright licensing fees (fees may be charged for the acts of duplication and support). IBM has brought counterclaims alleging that SCO has violated the GPL and breached IBM's copyrights by collecting licensing fees while distributing IBM's copyrighted material[11].

Status of current lawsuits

Main article: SCO v. IBM SCO v. IBM

Main article: Red Hat v. SCO Red Hat v. SCO

Main article: SCO v. Novell SCO v. Novell
AutoZone, a corporate user of Linux and former user of SCO OpenServer, was sued by SCO on March 3, 2004. SCO claims AutoZone violated SCO's copyrights by using Linux. This suit has been stayed pending the resolution of the IBM, Red Hat and Novell cases.

SCO v. AutoZone

Main article: SCO v. DaimlerChrysler SCO v. DaimlerChrysler

Other issues and conflicts
On June 23, 2003, SCO sent out a letter announcing that it would not be suing its own Linux customers. [16] In the letter, it states:
"SCO will continue to support our SCO Linux and OpenLinux customers and partners who have previously implemented those products and we will hold them harmless from any SCO intellectual property issues regarding Linux."

SCO announces that it will not sue its own customers
In August 2003, SCO presented two examples of what they claimed was illegal copying of copyrighted code from UNIX to Linux. One of the examples (Berkeley packet filter) was not related to original UNIX code at all. The other example did, however, seem to originate from the UNIX code and was apparently contributed by a UNIX vendor, Silicon Graphics. However, an analysis by the Linux community later revealed that:

The code originated from an even older version of UNIX which at some point was published by Caldera (the same Caldera which had later became SCO) thus making any claim of copyright infringement very shaky.
The code did not do anything. It was in a part of the Linux kernel that was written in anticipation of a Silicon Graphics architecture that was never released.
It had already been removed from the kernel two months earlier.
The contested segment was small (80 lines) and fairly trivial. SCO and SGI
In October 2003, BayStar Capital and Royal Bank of Canada invested USD$50 million in The SCO Group to support the legal cost of SCO's Linux campaign. Later it was shown that BayStar was referred to SCO by Microsoft, whose proprietary Windows operating system competes with Linux. In 2003, BayStar looked at SCO on the recommendation of Microsoft, according to Lawrence R. Goldfarb, managing partner of BayStar Capital: "It was evident that Microsoft had an agenda".
On April 22, 2004, The New York Times (p. C6) reported that BayStar Capital, a private hedge fund which had arranged for $50M in funding for SCO in October 2003, was asking for its $20M back. The remainder of the $50M was from Royal Bank of Canada. SCO stated in their press release that they believed that BayStar did not have grounds for making this demand. [17]
On August 27, 2004 SCO and BayStar resolved their dispute. [18]

SCO and BayStar Capital
The Canopy Group is an investment group with shares in a trust of different companies. It is a group owned by the Noorda family, also founders of Novell.
Until February 2005, Canopy held SCO shares, and the management of SCO held shares of Canopy. The two parties became embroiled in a bitter dispute when the Noorda family sought to oust board member Ralph Yarro III on claims of misappropriation. With internal problems not made public (which included the suicides of an employee and the daughter of Ray Noorda [19]), the Canopy Group agreed to buy back all the shares that SCO had in Canopy in exchange for their SCO shares and cash.
SCO and the Canopy Group are now completely independent.

SCO and Canopy Group
After their initial claim of copyright infringement in the Linux kernel, The SCO Group started their SCOsource initiative which sells licenses of SCO's claimed copyrighted software, other than OpenServer and Unixware licenses. After a small number of high profile sales (including one that was denied by the claimed purchaser), SCO claimed to offer corporate users of Linux a license at $699 (USD) per processor running Linux. However, many individuals have found it impossible to buy such a license from SCO. SCO says that participants of the SCOsource initiative are not liable for any claims that SCO makes against Linux users.

The Michael Davidson Email

Timeline of SCO-Linux controversies
Category:SCO-Linux litigation

Monday, September 24, 2007

Electronic registration mark
An electronic registration mark is a category of trademark that restricts the use of trademarked words and phrases in online advertising.
The State of Utah proposed this new regulation in response to complaints from trademark owners about how online advertisers have used trademarked terms. Some online advertisers, particularly search engines, allow trademarked keywords to generate advertisements for the trademark holder's competitor.
The Utah Trademark Protection Act created the electronic registration mark. Under this law, the owner of an electronic registration mark may prevent the use of its registered trademarks to generate advertisements for products that compete directly with the trademarked product. The owner of the mark may seek legal redress from both its competitor and the advertiser. This applies only to internet pages viewed within the State of Utah. Under the law, the state will provide all online advertisers with a searchable database of electronic registration marks. The state will provide this service free of charge. The law is scheduled to go into effect June 30, 2007.

Copyright
Patents
Trademarks
Industrial design rights
Utility models
Geographical indication
Trade secrets
Related rights
Tradenames
Domain names
Database rights
Mask work
Plant breeders' rights
Supplementary protection certificate
Traditional knowledge Controversy
Critics find several flaws with electronic registration marks. They argue that restricting the keywords that advertisers can use violates the First Amendment. Another issue concerns the advertiser's ability to determine whether a web page is being viewed in Utah or elsewhere: Because of this ambiguity, the law may be vulnerable to Dormant Commerce Clause challenges. Critics also assert that the law worsens the quality of online search results by restricting the search results that users can view. Supporters respond that trademark law has always considered trademark infringement to be a form of theft that is not protected speech, that search engines have demonstrated that they can pinpoint Internet users' locations, and that paid advertisements are not a core component of the Internet experience.

Sunday, September 23, 2007

Power supply in Norway
The power supply in Norway is primarily from hydroelectric power plants. Of the total production in 2004 of 110 TWh, 109 TWh was from hydroelectric plants, 900 GWh was from thermal power, and 260 GWh was wind generated. In 2004 the total consumption was 120 TWh.NVE
Norway has an open electric market, integrated with the other Nordic countries. Export and import is routine over the direct power links to Sweden, Denmark and Germany. The market is handled by Nordpool. Many of the hydroelectric plants in Norway are easily adjustable and can adopt well to variations in demand, and hence in price. On a normal day, when price is low during nighttime, Norway normally imports power, and exports during daytime when price is higher.
A significant share of the total electrical production is consumed by national industry.
During the last years, combination of high power price in the market and less than usual rain, has made the the power system more vulnerable to power shortages. So far consumers in Norway have noted this by paying a higher price for electrical power during wintertime, however still a low price in international terms.
Norway is considered by many to have particular expertise in the area of building and operation of hydroelectric power plants.

Saturday, September 22, 2007


Iconoclasm is the deliberate destruction within a culture of the culture's own religious icons and other symbols or monuments, usually for religious or political motives. It is a frequent component of major domestic political or religious changes. It is thus generally distinguished from the destruction by one culture of the images of another, for example by the Spanish in their American conquests. The term does not generally encompass the specific destruction of images of a ruler after his death or overthrow (damnatio memoriae), for example Akhenaten in Ancient Egypt.
People who engage in or support iconoclasm are called iconoclasts, a term that has come to be applied figuratively to any person who breaks or disdains established dogmata or conventions. Conversely, people who revere or venerate religious images are called iconodules in a Byzantine context, or iconophiles.
Iconoclasm may be carried out by people of a different religion, but is often the result of sectarian disputes between factions of the same religion. The two Byzantine outbreaks during the 8th and 9th centuries were unusual in that the use of images was the main issue in the dispute, rather than a by-product of wider concerns. In Christianity, iconoclasm has generally been motivated by a literal interpretation of the Ten Commandments, which forbid the making and worshipping of "graven images".

Major periods of iconoclasm

Main article: Iconoclasm (Byzantine)Iconoclasm Byzantine Iconoclasm
Sometime between 726-730, the Byzantine Emperor Leo III the Isaurian ordered the removal of an image of Jesus prominently placed over the Chalke gate, the ceremonial entrance to the Great Palace of Constantinople, and its replacement with a cross. Some of those who were assigned to the task were murdered by a band of iconodules.

The first iconoclastic period: 730-787
What accounts of iconoclast arguments remain are largely found in iconodule writings. To understand iconoclastic arguments, one must note the main points:
"Supported by the Holy Scriptures and the Fathers, we declare unanimously, in the name of the Holy Trinity, that there shall be rejected and removed and cursed one of the Christian Church every likeness which is made out of any material and colour whatever by the evil art of painters.... If anyone ventures to represent the divine image (χαρακτήρ, charaktēr) of the Word after the Incarnation with material colours, let him be anathema! .... If anyone shall endeavour to represent the forms of the Saints in lifeless pictures with material colours which are of no value (for this notion is vain and introduced by the devil), and does not rather represent their virtues as living images in himself, let him be anathema!"
"Satan misled men, so that they worshipped the creature instead of the Creator. The Law of Moses and the Prophets cooperated to remove this ruin...But the previously mentioned demiurge of evil...gradually brought back idolatry under the appearance of Christianity."



It was also seen as a departure from ancient church tradition, of which there was a written record opposing religious images.
Assertion that the biblical commandment forbidding images of God had been superseded by the incarnation of Jesus, who, being the second person of the Trinity, is God incarnate in visible matter. Therefore, they were not depicting the invisible God, but God as He appeared in the flesh. This became an attempt to shift the issue of the incarnation in their favor, whereas the iconoclasts had used the issue of the incarnation against them.
Further, in their view idols depicted persons without substance or reality while icons depicted real persons. Essentially the argument was "all religious images not of our faith are idols; all images of our faith are icons to be venerated." This was considered comparable to the Old Testament practice of only offering burnt sacrifices to God, and not to any other gods.
Regarding the written tradition opposing the making and veneration of images, they asserted that icons were part of unrecorded oral tradition (parádosis, sanctioned in Orthodoxy as authoritative in doctrine by reference to 2 Thessalonians 2:15, Basil the Great, etc.).
Arguments were drawn from the miraculous Acheiropoieta, the supposed icon of the Virgin painted with her approval by St Luke, and other miraculous occurrences around icons, that demonstrated divine approval of Iconodule practices.
Iconodules further argued that decisions such as whether icons ought to be venerated were properly made by the church assembled in council, not imposed on the church by an emperor. Thus the argument also involved the issue of the proper relationship between church and state. Related to this was the observation that it was foolish to deny to God the same honor that was freely given to the human emperor. Iconoclasm Issues in Byzantine Iconoclasm
In general, Islamic societies have avoided the depiction of living beings (animals and humans) within such sacred spaces as mosques and madrasahs. This opposition to figural representation is not based on the Qu'ran, but rather on various traditions contained within the Hadith. The prohibition of figuration has not always extended to the secular sphere, and a robust tradition of figural representation exists within Islamic art.

Friday, September 21, 2007


The solar wind is a stream of charged particles (i.e., a plasma) which are ejected from the upper atmosphere of the sun. It consists mostly of high-energy electrons and protons (about 1 keV) that are able to escape the sun's gravity in part because of the high temperature of the corona and the high kinetic energy particles gain through a process that is not well understood at this time.
Many phenomena are directly related to the solar wind, including geomagnetic storms that can knock out power grids on Earth, auroras (e.g., Northern Lights) and the plasma tail of a comet always pointing away from the sun. While early models of the solar wind used primarily thermal energy to accelerate the material, by the 1960s it was clear that thermal acceleration alone cannot account for the high speed solar wind. Some additional acceleration mechanism is required, but is not currently known, but most likely relates to magnetic fields in the solar atmosphere.

Properties
In the heliosphere, the composition of the solar wind is identical to the sun's corona: These components are present as a plasma, consisting of about 95% singly ionized hydrogen, 4% doubly ionized helium, and less than 0.5% other ions (often called minor ions). Carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, neon, magnesium, silicon and iron are the dominant minor ions. The exact composition has been routinely measured on Ulysses and ACE, two spacecraft carrying a Solar Wind Ion Composition Spectrometer. Unexpectedly, the solar wind composition shows substantial variation, likely directly reflecting the physics of the underlying corona. The first detailed composition measurements were performed by Geiss on the moon, which was part of the first Moon-landing. Solar wind was collected using a specially prepared metal-foil and then brought back for analysis. A similar technique was recently pursued using a robotic approach: A sample return mission, Genesis, returned to Earth in 2004 and is undergoing analysis, but it was damaged by crash-landing when its parachute failed to deploy on re-entry to Earth's atmosphere, possibly contaminating the solar samples.

Composition
Near Earth, the velocity of the solar wind varies from 200 to 889 km/s. The average is 450 km/s. Approximately 1×10) years. However, our current understanding of star formation implies that the Sun's solar wind may have been about 1000 times more massive in the distant past, which would seriously affect the history of planetary atmospheres and that of the martian atmosphere in particular.

Velocity and Mass Loss Rate
Since the solar wind is a plasma, it has the characteristics of a plasma, rather than a simple gas. For example, it is highly electrically conductive so that magnetic field lines from the sun are carried along with the wind. The dynamic pressure of the wind dominates over the magnetic pressure through most of the solar system (or heliosphere), so that the magnetic field is pulled into an Archimedean spiral pattern (the Parker spiral) by the combination of the outward motion and the Sun's rotation. Depending on the hemisphere and phase of the solar cycle, the magnetic field spirals inward or outward; the magnetic field follows the same shape of spiral in the northern and southern parts of the heliosphere, but with opposite field direction. These two magnetic domains are separated by a two current sheet (an electric current that is confined to a curved plane). This heliospheric current sheet has a similar shape to a twirled ballerina skirt, and changes in shape through the solar cycle as the Sun's magnetic field reverses about every 11 years.
The plasma in the interplanetary medium is also responsible for the strength of the Sun's magnetic field at the orbit of the Earth being over 100 times greater than originally anticipated. If space were a vacuum, then the Sun's 10 tesla. Magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) theory predicts that the motion of a conducting fluid (e.g., the interplanetary medium) in a magnetic field, induces electric currents which in turn generates magnetic fields, and in this respect it behaves like a MHD dynamo.

Interplanetary Magnetic Field
Outside the plane of the ecliptic the solar wind is steady and rapid, at speeds between 600 and 800 km/s; this is called the fast solar wind and it is known to emanate from solar coronal holes. In the plane of the ecliptic, near the heliospheric current sheet, the wind is slower, denser, and more variable, with typical speeds between 200 and 600 km/s and daily fluctuations by a factor of two or more. This is called the slow solar wind and its location of origin on the sun is less well known. This dichotomy is particularly true during or near solar minimum. During solar maximum, slow and fast winds are more mixed and can emanate from any latitude.

Fast and slow solar wind

Effects on the planets

Main article: Mercury (planet)#Atmosphere Mercury

Main article: Atmosphere of VenusSolar wind Venus

Main article: Magnetosphere Earth

Main article: Atmosphere of Mars Mars

Main article: Space weather Outer limits

Magnetopause
Magnetosphere
Ionosphere
Geosphere
Heliosphere
Helium Focusing Cone
Plasmasphere
Shock wave
Solar sail (Note: solar sails are propelled almost entirely due to the force of the sun's EM radiation, not the solar wind)
Parker spiral
Interplanetary Magnetic Field
Stellar wind

Thursday, September 20, 2007

École Nationale Supérieure d'Agronomie et des Industries Alimentaires
The École Nationale Supérieure d'Agronomie et des Industries Alimentaires (ENSAIA) is a French grande école located in Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy near Nancy in the Meurthe-et-Moselle département that specialises in biological and agricultural engineering.

Wednesday, September 19, 2007

American Heritage Dictionary
The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (AHD) is an American dictionary of the English language published by Boston publisher Houghton Mifflin, the first edition of which appeared in 1969. Its creation was spurred by the controversy over the Webster's Third New International Dictionary.
James Parton, the owner of the history magazine American Heritage, was appalled by the "permissiveness" of Webster's Third, published in 1961, and tried to buy the G. and C. Merriam Company so he could undo the changes. When that failed, he contracted with Houghton to publish a new dictionary. The AHD was edited by William Morris and relied on a usage panel of 105 writers, speakers, and eminent persons for usage notes.
The AHD broke ground among dictionaries by using corpus linguistics in compiling word-frequency and other information. The AHD made the innovative step of combining prescriptive elements (how language should be used) and descriptive information (how it actually is used); the latter was derived from text corpora. Citations were based on a million word, three-line citation database prepared by Brown University linguist Henry Kucera.
It is also somewhat innovative in its liberal use of photographic illustrations, which at the time was highly unusual for general reference dictionaries, many of which went largely or completely unillustrated. It also has an unusually large number of biographical entries for notable persons.
The first edition appeared in 1969, highly praised for its Indo-European etymologies. In addition to the normally expected etymologies, which for instance trace the word ambiguous to a Proto-Indo-European root ag-, meaning "to drive," the appendices included a seven-page article by Professor Calvert Watkins entitled "Indo-European and the Indo-Europeans" and "Indo-European Roots", 46 pages of entries that are each organized around one of some thousand inferred Proto-Indo-European roots and the English words of the AHD that are understood to have evolved from them. These entries might be called "reverse etymologies": the ag- entry there, for instance lists 49 words derived from it, as diverse as agent, essay, purge, stratagem, ambassador, axiom, and pellagra, along with information about varying routes through intermediate transformations on the way to the contemporary words.
The second edition, published in 1980, omitted the Indo-European etymologies, but they were reintroduced in the third edition, published in 1992. The third edition was also a departure for the publisher because it was developed in a database, which facilitated the use of the linguistic data for other applications, such as electronic dictionaries. The fourth edition (2000) added Semitic language materials, including an analogous appendix of roots. As of 2006, it remains the current edition. Throughout the various editions, however, the AHD has a long tradition of inserting minor revisions (such as a biographical entry, with photograph, for each newly elected U.S. President) in successive printings of any given edition.
The AHD is larger than the desk dictionaries of the time but smaller than Webster's Third New International Dictionary or The Random-House Dictionary of the English Language.
There is a lower-priced college edition with monocolor printing.